No photo available

Angela Williams

22 · StrikeCRITICAL RISKIdentity confirmed

Panel #6 · 44 · F · Cook · Social Worker

Public sources only · attorney review required · your call, not the AI's

Juror call

AI recommendation: Strike · 22/100— your decision below is recorded separately and always overrides the AI.

Status: Excused / dismissed

Notes (private — auto-saves as you type)

Attorney notes appear here — sign in to add notes

5-dimension AI analysis

/ 100

Strike

Case Fit18

Bias Risk88

Temperament46

Answer Quality58

Background24

Bias Risk reads the other way — lower is better for your side.

Angela WilliamsConfirmed by attorney

Match confirmed — public records indicate attendance at police accountability events.

Public posts, profiles and affiliations across every platform, read without logging in.

Profile: semi-public, consistent with identified advocacy activity

Facebook (public): shared posts about police accountability and a local advocacy group's events.

Spouse, employer, and household connections — sign in to access

CRITICAL RISK · 2 flags

🗳

FEC political contributionsDone

$1,100 in contributions to civil rights and advocacy organizations (2021–2023).

▼

⚖

PACER court recordsDone

Prior civil case as plaintiff against a municipal agency (employment, 2018, dismissed).

▼

Tailored to this juror's profile and findings — also listed on the Voir Dire page.

1
Your work as a social worker involves advocacy — could that affect how you view the City here?
2
Have your past experiences with government agencies shaped your views of the police?
3
Can you apply the preponderance standard and find for the City if the evidence supports it?

Questionnaire upload available after sign in