Live demo with fictional data. Try JuryPulse on your real case → jurypulse.app
JURYPULSEDemo
SC
Exit demo

Demo Disclaimer: All juror names, backgrounds, case information, research results, and data shown in this demo are entirely fictional and created for illustrative purposes only. This demo does not represent any real person, living or deceased. Any resemblance to actual individuals is coincidental. JuryPulse does not store, display, or use real personal information without proper legal authorization.

Thompson v. City of Springfield
MS
No photo available

Maria Santos

18 · StrikeCRITICAL RISKIdentity confirmed

Panel #4 · 37 · F · Cook · Community Organizer

Public sources only · attorney review required · your call, not the AI's

Juror call

AI recommendation: Strike · 18/100— your decision below is recorded separately and always overrides the AI.
Status: Excused / dismissed

Notes (private — auto-saves as you type)

Attorney notes appear here — sign in to add notes

Juror Score Profile

5-dimension AI analysis

18
/ 100
Strike
Case FitBias RiskTemperamentAnswer QualityBackground
Case Fit14
Bias Risk92
Temperament40
Answer Quality55
Background20

Bias Risk reads the other way — lower is better for your side.

Identity matches (1)

Maria SantosConfirmed by attorney

Match confirmed — public profile lists community organizing for police accountability initiatives.

Social media

Public posts, profiles and affiliations across every platform, read without logging in.

Profile: open book

Facebook and Instagram (both public): regular posts supporting police-accountability organizations, including a shared article on the underlying incident.

Associated People

Spouse, employer, and household connections — sign in to access

Background Research

CRITICAL RISK · 2 flags
🗳
FEC political contributionsDone

$4,200 donated to a civil rights litigation fund (2022–2024). Multiple contributions to advocacy organizations.

▼
⚖
PACER court recordsDone

Prior civil case as plaintiff against the City of Springfield (§1983, 2019, settled). Additional small-claims matter 2017.

▼

Risk flags

  • CRITICAL

    Prior §1983 plaintiff against the City of Springfield — strong cause and bias concern.

  • HIGH

    Documented civil rights advocacy and litigation-fund donations.

Voir dire follow-ups

Tailored to this juror's profile and findings — also listed on the Voir Dire page.

  1. 1

    You were previously a party in a lawsuit against the City — would that experience affect your ability to be fair here?

  2. 2

    Can you evaluate this case without reference to your prior matter against the City?

  3. 3

    Is there anything about a case involving the police that would make impartiality difficult for you?

Questionnaire Answers

Questionnaire upload available after sign in

Sign in to use JuryPulse on your real case →

Get started at jurypulse.app